State Sovereignty, Associational Interests, and Collective Religious Liberty
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Church-State Separation, Healthcare Policy, and Religious Liberty
this paper sketches a framework for the separation of church and state and, with the framework in view, indicates why a government’s maintaining such separation poses challenges for balancing two major democratic ideals: preserving equality before the law and protecting liberty, including religious liberty. the challenge is particularly complex where healthcare is either provided or regulated b...
متن کاملDoes Oppressed Religious Liberty Cause an Uprising in Terror Attacks?
The political community’s research comes across as inconclusive in regard to the relationship between liberty and terrorism, given the differing opinions on what defines ‘liberty’ and ‘terrorism.’ Most research up to 2016 has been done on terrorist data after 2001 and until 2010 (in some cases 2012). My research expands to the year 2014 to analyze the connection between religious oppression by ...
متن کاملIntergroup conflict: individual, group, and collective interests.
Intergroup conflicts generally involve conflicts of interests within the competing groups as well. This article outlines a taxonomy of games, called team games, which incorporates the intragroup and intergroup levels of conflict. Its aims are to provide a coherent framework for analyzing the prototypical problems of cooperation and competition that arise within and between groups, and to review...
متن کاملUnorganized Interests and Collective Action in Communist China
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive o...
متن کاملAfter Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?
Non-therapeutic circumcision violates boys' right to bodily integrity as well as to self-determination. There is neither any verifiable medical advantage connected with the intervention nor is it painless nor without significant risks. Possible negative consequences for the psychosexual development of circumcised boys (due to substantial loss of highly erogenous tissue) have not yet been suffic...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Secular Studies
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2589-2517,2589-2525
DOI: 10.1163/25892525-00101008